Lolita Libro PDF Free Download

Lolita Libro PDF Download Info

Lolita Novel By Vladimir Nabokov PDF Free Download, Overview, Summary, Reviews, Analysis, Get Book, Quotes, More By Author.

Lolita Libro PDF Free Download

Scholar, Aesthete, And Romantic Humbert Humbert Has Developed A Deep, Abiding Love For Dolores Haze, His Landlady’s Silky-skinned, Twelve-year-old Daughter. Humbert Suffers Immensely In The Name Of Love, Reluctantly Consenting To Wed Mrs. Haze Simply To Be Near Lolita. However, When Lolita Begins Seeking Attention Elsewhere, He Will Drag Her Off On A Frantic Cross-country Misadventure. Lolita Is A Flawless, Enduring Masterwork Of Obsession, Delusion, And Passion That Is Outrageous, Colourful, Heartbreaking, And Full Of Clever Wordplay.

Donald Vladimirovich Nabokov Was A Russian-american Author Also Known By His Pen Name, Vladimir Sirin. Nabokov Authored His First Nine Books In Russian Before Becoming Renowned Across The World As A Master Of English Language. He Had A Keen Interest In Chess Issues And Made Important Contributions To Lepidoptery.

The Most Significant And, At The Very Least, The Most Well-known Of Nabokov’s Novels Is Lolita (1955), Which Displays His Love Of Sophisticated Wordplay And Vivid Detail That Permeated All Of His Writings.

Lolita Came In At Number Four On The Modern Library’s List Of The 100 Best Novels, Followed By Pale Fire (1962), Which Came In At Number 53, And His Memoir Speak, Memory (1951), Which Came In At Number Eight On The Publisher’s List Of The Top 20th-century Nonfiction Works. Additionally, He Made It To Seven Different Finals For The National Book Award For Fiction.

Synopsis Of Lolita

The Fictitious John Ray, Jr., Ph.d., Describes The Unusual Narrative That Will Take Place In The Book’s Preface. Ray Claims That The Author’s Attorney Gave Him The Manuscript, Lolita, Or The Confession Of A White Widowed Male. While Awaiting Trial, The Author, Who Went By The Alias Humbert Humbert (Or H. H.), Passed Away In Custody From Coronary Thrombosis. Ray Claims That Despite The Author’s Evil Activities, His Work Is Nonetheless Elegant And Compelling. He Also Predicts That The Book Will Become Popular Among Psychiatrists And Inspire Parents To Give Their Kids Better Lives In A Better World.

In The Manuscript, Humbert Describes His Idyllic Upbringing On The Riviera, Where He Met Annabel Leigh, His First Love, When She Was Just Twelve Years Old. Humbert, Who Is Thirteen, And Annabel Never Marry, And Humbert Is Left With Regret When Annabel Passes Away From Typhus Four Months Later. Despite Beginning A Career As An English Literature Teacher, Humbert First Spends Time In A Mental Hospital And Holds A Number Of Odd Jobs. Humbert Continues To Have An Obsession With Sexually Attractive And Sexually Aware Adolescent Girls Despite His Finally Unsuccessful Marriage To An Older Lady. Though He Is Unable To Locate Another Person Like Annabel, These “Nymphets,” As He Refers To Them, Make Him Think Of Her. When Humbert Finally Makes It To The Country, He Rents A Room In The Widow Charlotte Haze’s Home In A Tranquil Suburb Of A New England Town. Dolores, Commonly Known As Lolita, Her 12-year-old Daughter, Captures His Attention Right Away. Humbert Obsessively Watches Lolita’s Every Move, Sometimes Flirts With Her, And Confides In A Notebook His Pedophilic Fantasies. Humbert Despises Charlotte Haze, But She Has Grown To Adore Him. Humbert Marries Charlotte In Order To Be Close To His Real Love When Charlotte Sends Lolita To Summer Camp. Despite Toying With The Idea Of Killing Charlotte In Order To Spend Some Alone Time With Lolita, Humbert Is Unable To Carry Out His Plan. Charlotte, However, Discovers His Journal And Confronts Him After Finding That He Despises Her But Adores Her Daughter. Charlotte Informs Humbert She Is Leaving Him And Storms Out Of The Home As Humbert Continues To Deny Everything. She Is Struck By A Vehicle At That Same Time, Killing Her Immediately.

Lolita Is Picked Up By Humbert After He Visits The Summer Camp. He Doesn’t Inform Her Charlotte Has Passed Away Until They Check Into A Hotel. According To Humbert’s Version Of Events, Lolita Seduces Him Rather Than The Other Way Around. Over The Course Of Nearly A Yearlong Road Trip, Lolita Learns To Manipulate Humbert And He Develops An Increasing Obsession With Her. Humbert Threatens To Place Her In An Orphanage If She Throws Fits Or Rejects His Approaches. A Mysterious Stranger Seems To Be Interested In Humbert And Lolita At The Same Time And Seems To Be Following Them As They Move.

Lolita Enrols In School While Humbert Ultimately Secures A Position At Beardsley College Someplace In The Northeast. Their Relationship Suffers As A Result Of Her Desire To Hang Out With Males Her Own Age, And Humbert Tightens His Regulations. However, He Permits Her To Take Part In A School Play. When Humbert Notices Lolita Acting Strangely Around Him, He Accuses Her Of Being Unfaithful And Drags Her Off On Another Road Trip. Humbert Feels That They Are Being Followed While Driving. When Humbert Claims Lolita Is Unaware Of The Situation, She Is Charged With Collaborating With Their Stalker.

When Lolita Is Sick, Humbert Has To Bring Her To The Hospital. The Nurses Inform Humbert That Her Uncle Has Already Taken Her Up When He Goes Back To Fetch Her. After Losing His Cool, Humbert Storms Out Of The Hospital, Furious And Devastated.

Over The Course Of The Subsequent Two Years, Humbert Looks For Lolita While Gathering Information About Her Kidnapper In An Effort To Exact Revenge. He Tentatively Starts Seeing Rita, But Soon After, He Gets A Message From Lolita, Who Is Now Married And Expecting A Child, Begging For Money. Humbert Decides To Murder Him Because He Believes Lolita Married The Guy Who Had Followed Them While They Were Travelling. He Discovers Lolita, Who Is 17 Years Old And Already Pregnant. Humbert Comes To The Conclusion That Lolita’s Abductor Was Not Her Spouse. When Pushed, Lolita Confesses That Clare Quilty, A Dramatist Who Has Been There Throughout The Whole Novel, Had Removed Her From The Hospital. Lolita Adored Quilty, But When She Refused To Take Part In An Orgy Including Child Pornography, He Ejected Her From The House. Humbert Asks Lolita To Come Back To Him Since He Still Loves Her. Lolita Politely Rejects. She Receives 4,000 Dollars From Humbert, Who Then Leaves. He Locates Quilty At His Residence And Kills Him With Numerous Shots. Once Being Detained And Writing His Book There While In Prison, Humbert Makes The Condition That It Can Only Be Released Once Lolita Passes Away. After Humbert Passes Away From Heart Failure And Lolita Dies Giving Birth, The Manuscript Is Sent To John Ray, Jr., Ph.d.

Lolita Reviews

Among The Covers

I Spoke With My Neighbourhood Bookseller About “Lolita” After Reading It Again. “No…and I’m Not Going To Either,” She Firmly Said. He Is A Child Molester. A Little Taken Aback, I Continued To Ask, “Who? The Character Or The Author? Thankfully, She Replied, “The Character.” This Exchange Demonstrated To Me How Sharply “Lolita” Can Still Polarise Opinions, Even Among Fiction Lovers. I Had Not Expected To Have This Conversation. Less Time Than My Work Commitments Usually Allow Me, I Finished Reading “Lolita” In A Matter Of Days, But I Was Pleasantly Surprised By How Simple It Was To Read. Even Though I Was Taking Notes, Aware That Nabokov Was Engaging In Game-playing (Even If I Didn’t Always Know What Game), And Aware That There Were Unfamiliar Words I Ought To Have Looked Up, I Found Myself Continually Drawn To The Conclusion. I Needed To Immediately Talk To Someone About My Experience. The “Spine Thrill Of Delight” Had Left Me With Flushed Cheeks, Tingling Nerve Endings, And The Sensation Of Having Just Had Sex With A Book. All I Needed Was Some Post-coital Conversation Since I Don’t Smoke. Additionally, Nobody Was Present For Conversation. Additionally, The Book Wasn’t Divulging Any Additional Information About Its Secrets. It Also Wasn’t Going To Compliment My Reading Skills Or Say How Attentive I Was. It Was There Again, Challenging Me To Begin Again.

Wordplay In Three Acts

On The Surface, “Lolita” Appear To Be A Relatively Simple Novel. You Very Much Know The Story Once You Realise That It Involves Sexual Relations Between 12-year-old Dolores “Lolita” Hayes And 37-year-old Humbert Humbert. There Is A Start, Middle, And End. Three Things: Grooming, Consumption, And Aftermath. Nabokov Creates A Three Act Play From His Material. And He Does It Dangerously, Seductively, Charmingly, Amusingly, And Playfully. I Still Find Myself Saying “Ha Ha” When I See Humbert’s Initials “H.h.” And Speculating As To Whether The Joke Is On Us. There Is A Lot More Behind The Novel’s Surface. A Complete Complex Living Organism Exists. You May Spend Days, Weeks, Months, Or Even A Lifetime Losing Yourself In Its Arms. As Long As Your Love Of Wordplay—both Words And Play—permits You. Once Again, On The Surface, There Seems To Be A Huge Conflict Between Morality And Aesthetics Inside The Pages. Whether Or Not Nabokov Intentionally Created The Conflict, He Created The Subject. In The Way We Read His Novel, We, The Readers, May Create Our Own Conflict. Nabokov Was Aware That The Topic Would Arouse Our Morals And Sense Of Righteousness, If Not Our Desires. The Novel’s Plot Weaves Morality And Aesthetics Together. They Embrace One Another In A Single, Extended Death Roll, Much Like Clare Quilty And Humbert Humbert. We Observe Their Interactions With Open Minds And Mouths, Yet Ultimately They Must Be Pulled Apart Or Divided. They Become One When They Are Together. They Are Each Other’s Double While They Are Apart.

The Lesson Of The Tale

There Is No Question That Having Sex With A Minor While An Adult Is Not Only Wrong, But Also Illegal. Unquestionably, It Is A Fact. Legally Speaking, The Adult’s Motivation Has No Bearing On The Evidence Of The Crime. The Minor’s Consent Is Not Relevant To The Crime’s Proof. Humbert Would Not Have Had A Legal Defence If He Had Been Accused Of Engaging In Sexual Relations With A Minor. It Wouldn’t Have Mattered If Lolita Had Actually Tried To Seduce Humbert. In Fact, The Evidence May Not Even Have Been Admissible, Except Maybe As A Component Of The Penalty Determination. In Other Words, Even If It Had To Do With Punishment, It Had Nothing To Do With Guilt. He Had No Moral Justification Either Since Morality Is A Social Construct That Depends On Collective Endorsement. The Determination By Society That An Act Is Immoral Does Not Really Depend On An Individual’s Own Beliefs. The Individual Has The Option To Either Comply Or Offend.

Of Cages And Traps

Over The Course Of Two Years, Humbert Offended Countless Times, Not Just Once. Even If Someone Wanted To Argue That This 12-year-old Seductress Walked Voluntarily Into The Trap, He Carefully Planned His Seduction, Set His Trap, And Caught His Prey. After Rescuing Lolita From The Trap, He Put Her In A Cage And Committed The Same Crime. She Had Several Opportunities To Escape The Cage (Which She Eventually Did), So One May Argue Again. However, Humbert Surrounded Lolita With A Complex System Of Self-doubt That Persuaded Her That If They Were Discovered, She Would Become A Ward Of The State.

Whether The Confession Is Legal

From Humbert’s Perspective, “Lolita” Is Written. It Is A Formal, Written Document, Not Just A Memory In His Head. In The 56 Days Between His 1952 Arrest (For Which He Was Only Charged With The Murder Of Clare Quilty) And His Death In Custody Before His Trial Could Begin, He Sat Down And Wrote It. To Tell The Story, I Find The Written Document To Be A Fascinating Literary Device. The Document Transforms Into A Book Within A Book. Even Though It Is Obvious That Nabokov Wrote It, All He Really Does Is Sandwich It Between A Foreword And A (Much Later) Afterword. The Relationship Between Humbert And The Reader Is Interestingly Established Through This Technique. It Is Comparable To A Confession Or A Witness Statement In Humbert’s Eyes. What He Confesses To Is Clearly Enough To Convict Him Of The Murder Crime To This Extent. He Also Outlines Crimes That, For Some Reason, He Was Never Charged With In It, However. All Of The Other Confessions Would Have Hurt His Client’s Case (At Least With Regard To Punishment) If His Lawyer Had Seen The Document While The Client Was Still Alive.

Function Of The Jury

The Confession Defines Our Relationship To The Described Events For The Reader. We Have Been Assigned The Position Of A Jury Member. This Tool Enables The Description, Reading, And Analysis Of Heinous Moral And Criminal Acts Within A Legal And Hence Legitimate Framework. The Book Inadvertently Turns Into A Report On Court Cases. We Are Able To See And Listen To Things That Would Otherwise Be Offensive, Prurient, And Against The Law. However, Since The Legal System Is A Crucial Component Of The Justice System, We Must Fulfil Our Obligations And Take Part In It. I’m Not Sure If We Are Still Voyeuristic Even Though We Have A Genuine Interest In Participating. Nabokov Has Ensnared Us In A Game That Seems To Be Serious But Is Really Just As Frivolous And Perverse As The Crime’s Subject Matter. In A Way, If Not For Humbert’s Crime, Then Maybe For Our Own Thought Crime, Nabokov Makes Us Complicit In A Crime. It Is Also Significant Because By The Time Humbert’s Confession Is Read, Lolita And He Had Both Passed Away Naturally. Humbert Speaks From Beyond The Grave. Nobody Is Still Alive, And Nobody Can Suffer Any More Harm Than They Have Already.

The Fox And The Peacock’s “Confessions Of An Unreliable Narrator”

I Looked Into These Issues In Order To Comprehend Humbert’s Reasons For Making His Confession. He Is Essentially Admitting Guilt. Even Though He Seems To Have Been In And Out Of Sanatoria At Times Of Crisis, I Don’t See Any Chance For An Insanity Defence. Additionally, I Don’t Believe That Anything He Discloses Will Lessen The Murder Penalty. He Just Had To Concentrate On His Worry That Quilty Had Wronged Lolita In A Way That Was Worse Than His Own Deeds To Achieve This. But It Seems Counterproductive To Confess To All Of These Other Crimes. In A Similar Vein, I Don’t Believe He Was Lying About The Specifics; Rather, I Believe He Was Telling The Truth And Doing So In Order To Be Understood, No More And No Less. Humbert’s Confession Is Not Just A Dirty Old Man’s Fiction, It Is Not Fabricated, It Is Not A Mirage. It Is His Fact, His Reality, His Truth, His Burden, His Shame, No Matter How Immoral, No Matter How Delusional, No Matter How Selfish And Narcissistic. He Wasn’t Insane; His Actions Were Those Of A Rational Man. He Was Movie Star Good Looking, Intelligent, Talented, Witty, Charming, Calculated, And Dangerous. He Was Without A Doubt An Exceptional Player And A Gifted Performer. Humbert, However, Is Neither An Actor Portraying A Different Fictional Character Or A Different Version Of Himself While Wearing A Mask. I Think We Are Now Recognising Him For Who He Really Is. He Is As Sly, Cunning, And Refined As A Peacock And As Dexterous, Elaborate, And Attractive As A Fox. His Ornamentation, Or Decoration, Is An Integral Part Of Him, Of His Life, His Loins, His Sin, And His Soul. He Was Prepared To Lie And Cheat In Order To Get What He Wanted While Pursuing Lolita. If Only Because There Was No Benefit To Lying, I Don’t Think He Was Ready To Lie To Us. He Only Questions The Accuracy Of His Memory When He Sometimes Doubts The Truth Of His Own Account. He Didn’t Have To Tell Lies To Be Lenient, Nor Did He Have To Conceal Anything In Order To Do So. He Would Only Be Found Guilty Of Crimes For Which He Had Not Been Charged In Addition To The Charge Of Murder For Which He Had Been Accused By Confessing To Anything. Other Than Telling The Truth As He Saw It, There Was No Use In Confessing To Anything Else. His Disclosures Would Actually Make His Punishment Worse Since They Weren’t Going To Win Him Any Favours Or Lessen The Severity Of His Sentence. I Don’t Think Of Humbert As A “Unreliable Narrator” In This Sense. I Am Aware That Some People May Respond By Saying That Paedophiles Lie Often And Can’t Help It. That Could Very Well Be The Case, But I Believe It Is Our Horror At His Crime, Our Moral Judgement Influencing How We View Him As A Whole, And Influencing How We Respond (Aesthetically) To The Book And The Character. Maybe Naively, I’m Trying To See The Good In Him. In The End, I Think Humbert Wanted Us To Comprehend His Love And What He Had Discovered About It At The End Of His Story, Regardless Of Whether It Was Morally Wrong.

What We Discuss When We Discuss Humbert’s Love

Technically Speaking, Humbert And Lolita’s Sexual Interactions Do Not Constitute “Paedophilia” (Defined As A Preference For A Pre-pubescent). The Sexual Relations Are Considered “Hebephilia” (Which Is A Sexual Preference For A Person In The Early Stages Of Puberty), Even If Nothing Moral Or Legally Is At Stake In The Distinction. The Greek Goddess Of Youth “Hebe” Is Where The Name “Hebe” Originates. She Personified Both Youth And Immortality. Her Name Means Prime Of Life Or Youth. She Served Nectar To The Olympian Gods To Grant Them Eternal Youth As Their Cup Bearer.

Obsessive Love, Part 1

For Me, Humbert’s Love Was Forbidden But Genuine In The First Half Of The Book. In That It Was A Love For The Specific Aesthetic Form That Youth Takes Between The Ages Of Ten And Fifteen, It Was A Transgressive Love. The Body Is In Its Most Ideal State; It Has Not Yet Begun To Deteriorate, Age, Wrinkle, Fill Out, Or Droop. He Finds Physical Ageing To Be Unattractive Beyond That Age (As He Did With His First Wife And Lolita’s Mother). Okay, We All Have A Say In Who Our Love Objects Are. How Can We Explain Our Decisions? There Isn’t A Way To Account For Love. Still, A Fear Or Disgust Of Ageing And Mortality Lies At The Core Of This Aesthetic Approach To Love. There Is An Unrealistic Desire To Remain Young And Immortal Forever, As Well As A Lack Of Understanding And Acceptance Of The Cycle Of Life And Death. Additionally, I Believe That This Aesthetic Viewpoint Contains Elements Of Narcissism Or Self-love. I Like Youth Because It Is The Ideal Representation Of My Own Youth. I Have Fallen Morally And Physically Since I Was Young. I Must Therefore Preserve My Youthful Appearance. I Wonder Whether This Viewpoint Can Only Be Held By Those Who Have Never Given Birth To Their Own Biological Child. Being A Parent Teaches You About The Realities Of Ageing. To Think You Can Survive And Overcome It Is A Delusion. However, Let The Cosmetics Industry Know That. I Have So Far Only Discussed Love In General Terms. In The Book’s First Section, I Struggled To Comprehend Humbert’s Love, And This Is The Best I Could Do. I Won’t Say I Felt Sorry For Him, But I Believe I Understood Who He Was And What He Stood For. Even His Obsession Seemed Understandable To Me. How Many Of Us Trap And Oppress Our Love Interest In The Early Stages Of A Relationship To The Point That We Are Unable To See How Oppressive We Were Until The Union Has Been Consummated, Transformed Into Something More Mature, Or Come To An End? However, At The Conclusion Of The First Part (The Consummation) And The Beginning Of The Second Part (The Imprisonment), Things Began To Change. Of Course The Love Had To End, But Despite How Ordinary The Event’s Description Was, It Brought Attention To The Fact That The First Part Was A Trap Lolita Had To Fall Into. Even If The Language Was Lighthearted And Poetic, Its Purpose Was Sinister.

Second Section (Enthralling Love)

After Capturing Lo, Humbert Makes It Clear In The Second Act That Their Relationship Will Only Last For Three Years, Or More Specifically, From 1 January 1947 To 1 January 1950, Which Corresponds To Her 12th To 15th Birthdays. After This, Lo Will Morph Out Of Her Nymphet Form, At Least According To Statistics. Humbert’s Love Is Thus Just Intended For The Latter Stage Of Her Life, After Which He Intends To Leave Her. Keeping Lolita In Captivity During This Phase Would Ensure That She Is Available For Him Alone. The Fairy Tale Promises Of “Happily Ever After” Or “’til Death Do Us Part” Are Not Present In This Love Action. There Is Just Narcissism And Self-centeredness; There Is No Love Or Concern For The Other. I’ve Tried To Think Of Humbert’s Definition Of Beauty As An Aesthetic One. I Have Attempted To Separate It From Morality In Order To Better Understand It. Nevertheless, The Fact That It Could Be Turned On And Off At Such Observable Times Turned Me Against Humbert Whether I Considered It From The Perspectives Of Aesthetics Or Morality, Obsession Or Love. At Least, He Can Predict With Clinical Accuracy When He Will Return To “Normality” Or A State Of Not Loving, Showing That He Is In Control Of This Feeling Called Love. He Knew When The Effects Of The Drug Would Wear Off Since His Love Was A Drug He Took Too Often. I Thus Began To Think That There Was No Self-loss In His Love. Instead, It Was An Overt Or Egregious Display Of Narcissism. It Follows That There Was No Attempt To “Satisfy” Lo Personally Or Sexually. There Was No Sense Of A Satisfying Relationship Or Sexual Encounter (Although, To Be Fair, He Avoids Discussing The Specifics Of Their Sexual Activity Other From Physical Exertion). But I Had The Impression That When It Came To Consuming His Love, All He Cared About Was Sticking His Dick Into The Object Of His Affection. Okay, Many Sexual Relationships Can Be Simplified To This Basic Penetrative Act. Some Men Believe That Women Are Nothing More Than The Cup Into Which They Spill Their Maleness And Its Many Manifestations. Though It Was Transgressive, I Began To Get The Impression In The Second Part That Humbert’s Goal Was To Desecrate Or Ruin The Beauty That Had Drawn Him In The First. It Also Stood Out To Me In The Three Year Zone Of Enchantment That Humbert Would Only Look For The Next Beautiful Nymph To Stick His Dick Into. So It Became More And More Clear To Me That He Was A Serial Destroyer Of Beauty Rather Than An Actual Lover Or Admirer Of It. This Love Is Hotwired With Hatred Or Disgust. When The Time Comes To Remove The Flowers From Your Vase And Put Them In The Trash, You Often Don’t Hate Them. However, You Get The Impression That The Moment The Calendar Turned Over, Humbert Would Have Been Disgusted By His Former Love Objects, His Objet D’obsession. Obviously, More Traditional Relationships Show The Same Disgust Or Loss Of Interest. It Might Be The Cause Of The Man’s Mid-life Crisis When He Flees With The Younger Woman. It Might Explain Why We Find It Difficult To Accept Ageing, At Least In Our Partner. It Might Explain Why Some Men Still Think Of Themselves As The Unchangeable 20-year-old Who Deserves A Partner Who Is Young And Attractive, Regardless Of How Frail Or Old Or Fat Or Ugly They Have Grown To Be. Therefore, The Rest Of Us Can Learn Something About Our Own Love From Humbert’s Love.

Finale (Adult Love Refused)

I Wrote The Most Of My Comments On The Second Part Of The Novel Before Finishing The Last Chapter. I Must Stress That My Reaction To Humbert’s Own Words Was Largely What Turned Me Against Him. Neither He Nor Nabokov Withheld The Information That Would Have Turned Me Against Him. Nevertheless, I Continued To Read Until Chapter 29, When Humbert And The Pregnant, Married, And 17-year-old Dolores Reconnected. Your Interpretation Of The Confessions In This Chapter Will Determine What You Think Of Humbert And His Love And Whether Or Not You Believe Him To Be Telling The Truth.

“There She Was (My Lolita! ), Hopelessly Worn At Seventeen, With That Baby, There She Was With Her Ruined Looks And Her Adult, Rope-veined Narrow Hands And Her Gooseflesh White Arms And Her Shallow Ears And Her Unkempt Armpits… “What I Used To Pamper Among The Tangled Vines Of My Heart…had Dwindled To Its Essence: Sterile And Selfish Vice, All That I Cancelled And Cursed…and I Looked And I Looked At Her, And Knew As Clearly As I Know I Am To Die, That I Loved Her More Than Anything I Had Ever Seen Or Imagined On Earth, Or Hoped For Anywhere Else… ” “What I Used To Pamper Among The T I Insist That The World Knows How Much I Loved My Lolita, This Lolita, Pale And Polluted, Big With Another’s Child, But Still Gray-eyed, Still Sooty-lashed, Still Auburn And Almond, Still Carmencita, Still Mine. “You May Jeer At Me, And Threaten To Clear The Court, But Until I Am Gagged And Half-throttled, I Will Shout My Poor Truth.

Humbert’s Journey Has Many More Stops, Like This One. Outside Of The Hebephile Zone, He Realised That He Still Loved Her. He Continued To Cling To “His” Lolita, The Lolita Of His Illusory Conception Of Love, Nonetheless. Dolores Was Obviously Never “His” Version Of Reality; She Stood On Her Own Two Feet And Turned Down His Love Twice. His Realisation That He “Did Not Know A Thing About [his] Darling’s Mind” Or That “A North American Girl-child Named Dolores Haze Had Been Deprived Of Her Childhood By A Maniac” Is Revealed Only After This. Then He Quotes “An Old Poet”—possibly Nabokov—in The Following Manner:

The Duty That We Owe To The Mortal Sense Of Beauty Is “The Moral Sense In Mortals.”

That Is To Say, You Cannot Just Indulge Your Aesthetic Sense Of Beauty At The Expense Of A Real Human Being Since It Is Bound By Morality And Is Therefore Attached To It. Innocence And Beauty Are Safeguarded From Those Who Would Trample On And Destroy Them By Morality, Taboo, And The Law. He Wasn’t A Nietzschean Superman; He Wasn’t Above The Law. In His Own Play, He Was The Fool.

It’s A Tragedy

There Are Rumours That Humbert Only Realised That He Really Loved Dolores According To Conventional Standards After It Was Too Late And That Nabokov Saw Humbert’s Story As A Tragedy. That Could Be The Case, But Humbert Was Only Responsible For Himself. He Was A Victim Of His Own Doing, And The Suffering He Subjected Dolores Through In Order To Get His “Lolita” Was Nothing Compared To The Suffering He Caused Her To Endure.

Lolita Libro pdf link: