Josh Hawley Book PDF Free Download

Josh Hawley Book PDF Download Info

Josh Hawley Book: The Republican’s Book About Masculinity Is Here—and It’s Every Bit As Unhinged As You’d Think, Josh Hawley’s ‘manhood’ Joins A Long Tradition Of Masculine Advice, ‘leading National Pipsqueak’: Josh Hawley’s ‘manhood’ Book Gets Vicious Reviews.

Josh Hawley Book PDF Free Download

The Tyranny Of Big Tech Author, Constitutional Attorney, And Senator For Missouri Believes That Men’s Character And The Manly Virtue That Goes With It Are Essential Components Of A Functional Society And A Strong, Free Republic.

A Culture That Despises Males Cannot Continue To Be Free.

The American Founders Believed That Certain Male Traits Are Necessary For A Republic To Exist. Josh Hawley, A Senator, Believes They Were Correct. He Challenges American Men To Accept Their God-given Duties As Husbands, Dads, And Citizens In A Daring New Book.

Without Moral Men To Stand Up For What Is Right And True, No Republic Has Ever Been Able To Endure. Hawley Defines The Defining Characteristics Of Men, Such As Responsibility, Courage, Loyalty, And Leadership. He Does This By Starting With The Wisdom Of The Ancients, From The Greek And Roman Thinkers To Jesus Of Nazareth, And Relying On The Lessons Of American History.

The Whole Life Of The State, According To Theodore Roosevelt, “Depends On The Character Of Its Population. I Am For Business. But I’m A Masculinity Advocate First. Hawley Explains Why The Reckless Attack Against Masculinity In Media, Workplace, School, And All Levels Of Government Is An Attack On Freedom Itself.

Every American Patriot Must Read Manhood: The Masculine Virtues America Needs Because It Is Real-world, Urgent, And Practical.

Josh Hawley Is A Missouri State Senator, New York Times Bestselling Author, And Constitutional Attorney. Josh Is One Of The Most Well-known Politicians In America And Was Chosen As The Nation’s Youngest Senator In 2018. He Is Widely Recognised For Fighting For Middle America And Taking On Big Tech. He Has Argued Cases Defending The First Amendment In Courts All Around The Nation, Including Before The U.s. Supreme Court. From 2017 To 2019, He Also Served As Missouri’s Attorney General, The State’s Top Prosecutor. Josh Got Engaged To Erin Hawley When They Were Both Working As Supreme Court Clerks. Elijah, Blaise, And Abigail Are The Three Kids That Josh And Erin Have. They Are Ozark, Missouri Residents.

Synopsis Of The Tyranny Of Big Tech

Following the attack on the Capitol on January 6, Senator Joshua Hawley (R-MO) became well-known to many Americans for the first time. Before the incident started, Hawley was seen walking towards the Capitol with his left hand up and gazing towards the demonstrators. Some of those demonstrators would storm the Capitol an hour later in an unparalleled assault on American democracy. The Senate reconvened after law enforcement had secured the Capitol. A challenge to Arizona’s electoral votes was discussed by senators before being defeated 93-6. Six senators, including Hawley, voted in favour of the objection.

The Missouri junior senator’s actions on January 6th served as a reminder that he had been establishing himself as one of President Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters. However, Hawley’s backing for Trump goes well beyond election campaign showmanship. Hawley has been opposing the Republican Party’s stated support for minimal government and the private economy, just as Trump has. The constant Republican criticism of “Big Tech” companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon may be the best example of this rejection. The Tyranny of Big Tech, Hawley’s most recent book, aims to address concerns about these businesses and provide solutions to families and legislators. The book’s political analysis will be useful to individuals interested in the future of the Republican Party, and its analyses of fears related to “Big Tech” companies offer valid concerns. However, its policy suggestions lack merit. Surprisingly, the market economy and small government that Hawley, Trump, and their supporters criticise provide the most effective solutions to their problems.

How much of Hawley’s work reads like left-leaning literature is one of its most startling aspects. Shoshana Zuboff, a Harvard professor and hardly a populist conservative, is the author of the best-selling book Surveillance Capitalism, which chapters criticise Big Tech’s eavesdropping, addictive products, and the impact of social media on mental health. Many of the points made in “The Social Dilemma” on Netflix may be found in Hawley’s book, which will be of interest to viewers.

The parts of the book where Hawley discusses the unsettling affects social media may have on many people’s mental health—especially young girls—are the most moving. Anyone who is concerned about the increase in adolescent suicide, lonesomeness, and depression linked to the advent of social media need not be a conservative, however we must always keep in mind that correlation does not necessarily equate to causation.

Unfortunately, most of the remaining text in the book sometimes lacks specificity, which is ineffective and misleading to readers. The usage of the word “monopolies,” which is often used to characterise rivals, is the most glaring example of imprecision.

One should hesitate while reading the Big Tech discussions since the phrase “monopolies” is often used. The term “monopoly” refers to the exclusive vendor of a commodity in a market, as its etymology would imply. All of the Big Tech behemoths were unsuitable. Big Tech firms do engage in competition across a variety of industries, including those for operating systems, smart speakers, cloud computing, interpreting services, and more.

Many worries about Big Tech firms are based on the idea that these firms discriminate against conservatives and have a major impact on public discourse. In fact, Hawley devotes a whole chapter of his book to the way that Google and well-known social media companies organise and delete material. Although it is true that Google is the most often used search engine and that Facebook is the most widely used social media platform, the success of these businesses does not prove that they have monopolistic power. Nobody reading this review has ever gotten a charge from Facebook or Google for using a Facebook account. Neither has anybody reading this review ever gotten a fee from Google for doing a Google search. This is so that neither Google nor Facebook are selling search or social networking. Facebook and Google are rivals, not monopolies. However, Hawley’s book often refers to Big Tech companies as monopolies.

It’s possible that one of the appeals of labelling Big Tech companies “monopolies” is that it facilitates Hawley’s comparison of the CEOs of Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon to the “robber barons” of the Gilded Age. President Woodrow Wilson is not a favourite of Hawley; he prefers President Teddy Roosevelt. The Tyranny of Big Tech presents Wilson as the forerunner of the “corporate liberalism” that Hawley says has dominated American economic thought for the last century, and Roosevelt as a fighter against corporations. It is quite evident from the book that Hawley longs for a contemporary Roosevelt to take on Big Tech.

The Tyranny Of Big Tech Reviews

However, Hawley’s Approach To The History Is Very Simplistic. It’s An Interesting Tale, And Hawley Tells It Well, As Gilad Edelman Noted In His Review Of The Tyranny Of Big Tech In Wired. The Issue Is That Almost Every Significant Factor Is Incorrect. Explains Edelman:

Roosevelt, Not Wilson, Supported Elite Collaboration Between The Government And Business During The 1912 Election. Roosevelt Had Come To The Conclusion That “Good” Trusts Were Acceptable As Long As He Had Control Over Them During The 1904 Confrontation With Morgan. The Tycoons Found This Arrangement To Be Much More Tolerable. Roosevelt’s Progressive Party Was Led By George Perkins, A Partner Of Morgan’s At U.s. Steel, And Received Significant Financial Support From Him During The 1912 Campaign. Morgan Personally Contributed To Roosevelt’s 1904 Reelection Campaign In Excess Of $4 Million In Modern Dollars. These Friendly Relationships Go Unmentioned By Hawley. Wilson, On The Other Hand, Was The 1912 Candidate Who Really Opposed Monopolies.

Hawley’s Discussion Of Monopolies Is Particularly Perplexing Since It Is Not Necessary To Believe That Google And Facebook Are Monopolies To Worry About Their Influence On Modern Politics And Online Speech. The Fact That Google And Facebook Are Not Monopolies Is Also Not A Guarantee That You Will Agree With Every Choice They Have Made. As Was Already Said, There Are Legitimate Worries Linked To The Most Well-known Social Media Platforms.

However, Hawley’s Policy Suggestions In Response To His Many Criticisms Of Big Tech Are Either Based On A Poor Comprehension Of The Relevant Legal And Historical Developments Or Run The Risk Of Entrenching Market Incumbents.

Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act Is At The Centre Of The Current Discussions Around Online Speech And Big Tech. The 1996 Law States That Interactive Computer Services Like Facebook And Twitter Are Not The Publishers Of The Majority Of Third-party Content And Are Thus Not Subject To Civil Liability For Content Moderation Decisions. It Was A Response To A Dilemma That Surfaced When Early 1990s Court Cases Involving Third-party Online Content Were Being Decided. These Situations Forced Interactive Computer Services To Make An Uncomfortable Decision: Either Remove The Content At The Risk Of Being Accused Of Publishing Third-party Content, Or Refrain From Engaging In Content Moderation And Risk Being Accused Of Being A Distributor Akin To A Book Or News Vendor. Both Options Lack Appeal. Online Services Want To Remove A Lot Of Legal But Offensive Speech, But Treating Them Like Publishers Of Third-party Content Would Severely Restrict The Usefulness Of Online Bulletin Boards, Forums, Comment Sections, And Other Spaces For Such Speech.

Google, Facebook, Amazon, And Twitter Did Not Exist When Section 230 Was Passed By Congress. Hawley, However, Asserts That Big Tech “Loved” Section 230 At The Time It Was Passed In 1996. Hawley Continues By Calling Section 230 A “Subsidy” For Big Tech While Omitting To Point Out That Section 230 Applies To All Interactive Computer Services, Big And Small, Including Those Belonging To Companies Not Clearly Associated With Tech Sectors. As An Example, The Wall Street Journal, A Publication In The Journalism Sector, Benefits From Section 230 Since The Comments Section On Its Website Is A Legally Protected Interactive Computer Service.

Senator J. James Exon (D-ne), Who Made The Observation In The Senate, Is Cited By Hawley. He States That “The Fundamental Purpose Of The Communications Decency Act Is To Provide Much Needed Protection For Children.” Reps. Chris Cox (R-ca) And Ron Wyden (D-or), The Two Authors Of Section 230, Failed To Make Any Comments, According To Hawley. In Recent Statements, Cox And Wyden Agreed That “Section 230 Is Agnostic About What Point Of View, If Any, A Website Chooses To Adopt.” While It Is True That Lawmakers At The Time Were Concerned About Protecting Children From Pornography, The Law’s Authors Were Also Considering A Wider Variety Of Content.

Hawley’s Policy Proposals Include Section 230, But The Changes He Seeks Wouldn’t Lead To The Results He Wants. Any Interactive Computer Service That Engages In “Behavioural Advertising,” Which He Defines As Ads Based On Specific User Data, Should Lose The Protections Provided By Section 230, According To Hawley. Big It Companies Would Be Impacted By Such A Strategy, But Smaller Businesses Looking To Compete With Google And Facebook Would Be More Negatively Impacted. The Lawyers And Engineers Required To Navigate Dramatic Legislative And Regulatory Changes Can Be Employed By Big Tech Giants. Their Rivals Are Unable To. Criticising Behavioural Advertising Is One Thing, But Addressing It By Amending Section 230 Would Most Likely Make Big Tech Even Bigger.

Conceptually, Other Policy Proposals Are Confused. Hawley Wants Every Citizen In The United States To Have The Right To Request That Online Services Delete “The Personal Data They Have On File.” This May At First Seem Appealing, But It Is Not Immediately Clear What “Personal Data” Are Or To Whom They Apply. Is It Information About John, Jill, Or Both If John Is Married To Jill? What If Jill Does Not Want That Personal Data Removed But John Does? It Is Simple To Come Up With More Intricate Examples That Raise Challenging Issues.

Hawley Does Not Deny That His Policy Recommendations Aim To Undermine The Fundamental Business Model Of Google And Facebook. However, The Strategy Runs The Risk Of Flooding The Baby With Dirty Water. Behavioural Ads And Section 230 Are Used By Many Services. They Are Not Limited To A Few Businesses With Headquarter Locations On America’s West Coast.

The Book’s Last Chapter Has One Of Its Most Intriguing Sections, In Which Hawley Discusses How He And His Wife Have Established Rules For Their Kids Around When They May And Cannot Use Electronic Devices. There Are Many Services And Products That Aim To Provide Users Alternatives To The Snooping That Many Across The Political Spectrum Find Creepy. Those Worried About Big Tech Surveillance And Manipulation Are Free To Restrict Their Children’s Access To Certain Devices. However, In A Market Economy Where Incumbents Are Unable To Entrench Themselves Via Regulatory Capture, Such Services And Products Have The Best Chance Of Competing With Big Tech.

The Tyranny Of Big Tech Remains Valuable, At Least To Those Interested In Political Anthropology, Despite Offering Few Realistic Policy Solutions. The Book Gives A General Overview Of The Politics We Might Expect From The Republican Party If Trump And His Allies Maintain Their Control Of The Organisation. The Republican Party Of The Previous Generation Is Explicitly Rejected In Hawley’s Book, And “Corporate Liberalism” Is Targeted. Hawley Claims That “Corporate Liberalism” Has Long Dominated Both The Political Left And Right. Hawley Is Willing To Break The Republican Party’s Historic Commitment To Free Markets And Limited Government, As The Tyranny Of Big Tech Makes Clear, In Order To Put An End To “Corporate Liberalism.” It Is Still Unclear If The Republican Party Will Ever Untie Its Embrace Of Trump And His Populist Stance. Hawley’s Book Is A Good Place To Look For What Kind Of Politics We Might Expect After America’s Next Political Realignment If Trump-style Populism Is A Feature Rather Than A Bug In The Current Republican Software.

Josh Hawley all Book pdf free download