Cloward Piven Strategy PDF Free Download

Cloward Piven Strategy PDF Download Info

Cloward Piven Strategy PDF Free Download, The Cloward-Piven Strategy, Steps & Aftermath, The Cloward-Piven Strategy: Orchestrating A Crisis So Government Can “Solve” It.

Cloward Piven Strategy PDF

A Divisive Political And Social Theory Called The Cloward-piven Approach First Appeared In The United States In The 1960s. It Is Often Debated In Relation To Social Policy And Welfare. The Two Main Proponents Of The Approach, Sociologists And Political Activists Richard Cloward And Frances Fox Piven, Are Named After The Tactic.

According To The Cloward-piven Technique, Political And Social Change May Be Achieved By Overtaxing Government Welfare Programmes And Inciting A Crisis That Prompts Substantial Policy Changes. The Cloward-piven Strategy’s History, Tenets, Detractors, And Ramifications Will All Be Covered In This Article.

Origins of the Cloward-Piven Strategy:

In Order To Draw Attention To The Political Strategies Used By Those Attempting To Curtail Liberty, Conduit For Action Produced An Essay Last Autumn Titled “Are You The Victim Of Rules For Radicals?” There Was A Tease For A Future Analysis Of The Cloward-piven Strategy Towards The Conclusion Of The Piece. That Article Is This One.

The Cloward-piven Strategy’s Ultimate Objective Is To Instigate A Political Crisis That Results In A Guaranteed Yearly Income.[1] In Essence, The Cloward-piven Plan Would Result In Socialism/communism Having Total Control Over The Populace.

In The Past, Frances Fox Piven Taught Political Science And Sociology At The City University Of New York Graduate Centre.[2] Sociologist And Liberal Activist Richard Cloward, Who Passed Away, Was Married To Actress Vivien Piven.[3]

A Renowned Liberal Political And Cultural Publication Called The Nation Unveiled Its “Strategy” On May 2, 1966. It Included Using A Political Crisis To Get A Guaranteed Yearly Salary. Their Major Strategy To Address The Situation, According To One Journal, Was To Launch “A Massive Drive To Recruit The Poor Onto The Welfare Rolls.” To Manage These Substantial Social Programmes, A Federal Programme Would Be Required. Due To The Fact That “The Poor Are Most Visible And Close To Home In Local Communities, Antagonism Towards Them Has Always Been More Intense Locally Than At The Federal Level,” Enrolment Would Be Lower If It Were Handled Locally.

This Implies That Increased Local Monitoring Would Prevent The Benefit Rolls From Growing To The Sizes Required To Trigger A Financial Catastrophe. As A Result, They Decided To Shift The Programmes To Washington, D.c., Where People Are Less Aware Of Their Expenses And Monitoring.

The Plan Also Disregarded The Idea That One Might Escape Poverty By Using Any “Institution Of Private Enterprise,” Sending The Message That Sacrificial Labour, Formal Education, And Personal Accountability Could Not Alleviate Poverty. Their Only Option Is A “Federal Programme Of Income Redistribution” That Aims To “Elevate The Poor En- Masse From Poverty.”

A Guaranteed Income Is One Way To Alleviate Poverty, But There Shouldn’t Be Any Strings Attached, Such As A Demand That You Work. According To Them, Conditional Benefits Lead To Widespread Mistreatment Of The Poor And Abuses Of Civil Rights Throughout The Country. They Thus Contend That There Should Be No Restrictions On People’s Rights To Other People’s Money. According To This Reasoning, They Have A Right To Force Others To Give Them Money Just Because They Are There. The Significance Of Publicising These Advantages Is Something Else That Cloward And Piven Emphasise.

The Cloward-piven Approach Also Emphasises The Need For Rigorous Legal Examination Of Any Benefit Elimination. In Order To Put Up Barriers Against The Revocation Of Benefits Once Granted, The Benefits Should Be Subject To Administrative Hearings As Well As Extra Judicial Proceedings. According To Their Theory, Attorneys May “Be Recruited On A Voluntary Basis, Especially Under The Banner Of A Movement To End Poverty By A Strategy Of Asserting Legal Rights.” Bring In The Aclu.

The Liberal Approach Argues For Creating A “Climate Of Militancy” To Combat Welfare-seeking Attitudes. They Claim That It Will Be Crucial To Utilise The Media To Educate The Larger Liberal Community About The Inefficiencies And Inequities Of Assistance As The Situation Worsens. The Mainstream Media Has Been Taken Over By Liberals.

Their Ideal Political Movement Would Consist Of “Cadres Of Aggressive Organisers… From The Churches, The Civil Rights Movement, And Militant Low-income Organisations Like Those Formed By Saul Alinksy And Other Groups On The Left.”

Due To The Fact That They Emphasise That “Once Eligibility For Basic Food And Rent Grants Is Established, The Dram On Local Resources Persists Indefinitely,” Their Strategy Was Also Innovative In Terms Of Fostering Generational Welfare Dependence. “A Coalition Between Poor Whites And Poor Blacks” Was Their Intended Market.

Their “Ultimate Aim Of This Strategy Is A New Programme For Direct Income Distribution,” Commonly Known As Socialism/communism Throughout History, Which Has Resulted In The Demise, Hopelessness, And Depravity Of Hundreds Of Millions Of People.

The Earliest Description Of The Cloward-piven Technique Was In A 1966 Essay For The Left-leaning Publication The Nation. The United States’ Current Welfare System, According To Richard Cloward And Frances Fox Piven, Is Insufficient And Does Not Provide The Poor Enough Benefits.

They Hoped They Might Create A Crisis By Overburdening The Welfare System With New Claimants, Forcing The Government To React With More Generous Welfare Programmes, And Maybe Paving The Way For More Significant Social Reform.

Principles of the Cloward-Piven Strategy:

1. Mass Mobilization: The strategy involves mobilizing a large number of people to apply for welfare benefits, particularly those who might not typically qualify. This mass mobilization is intended to put immense pressure on the welfare system.
2. Legal Activism: Cloward and Piven also advocated for using legal means to expand eligibility for welfare benefits. They believed that by challenging existing regulations and policies, they could open the door for more people to receive benefits.
3. Crisis Creation: The core idea of the strategy is to create a crisis within the welfare system. This crisis would be characterized by an overwhelming number of applicants, which the existing system could not handle.
4. Government Response: Cloward and Piven anticipated that once the welfare system was in crisis, the government would have to respond by expanding welfare programs and providing more generous benefits to accommodate the increased demand.
5. Policy Transformation: The ultimate goal of the strategy was not just to secure better welfare benefits but also to bring about broader societal change. Cloward and Piven believed that the crisis and the government’s response would pave the way for more radical policies and a shift toward a more socialist or welfare-oriented society.

Criticism and Controversy:

The Cloward-Piven strategy has been highly controversial and criticized on several fronts:

1. Ethical Concerns: Critics argue that deliberately overloading the welfare system to create a crisis is unethical, as it may harm vulnerable individuals who depend on those benefits for survival.
2. Effectiveness: Many experts and policymakers question the effectiveness of the strategy. They argue that while it may create short-term disruptions, it is unlikely to lead to long-term systemic change.
3. Legal and Political Barriers: The strategy’s reliance on legal activism faces significant legal and political obstacles, as changes to welfare policy typically require legislative action and broad political support.
4. Unintended Consequences: Some critics argue that the strategy could have unintended consequences, such as increasing opposition to welfare programs and leading to more restrictive policies.
5. Discrediting Advocacy: The controversial nature of the strategy has the potential to discredit legitimate advocacy efforts for welfare reform and social justice.
6. Overestimation of Government Response: Critics contend that Cloward and Piven overestimated the government’s willingness to respond to a crisis by implementing more generous welfare policies. In reality, political considerations and fiscal constraints often limit such responses.

Implications and Legacy:

While the Cloward-Piven strategy itself has not led to the radical changes envisioned by its proponents, it has had some indirect implications and a lasting legacy:

1. Influence on Activism: The strategy has influenced some activist movements and organizations that seek to challenge and change government policies through mass mobilization and legal actions.
2. Debate on Welfare Policy: It has contributed to ongoing debates about the structure and effectiveness of welfare policies in the United States and other countries.
3. Political Polarization: The controversy surrounding the strategy has contributed to political polarization, with some viewing it as a radical left-wing approach and others as a critique of the existing welfare system.
4. Policy Reforms: While not resulting in a complete overhaul of the welfare system, the strategy may have played a role in pushing for certain policy reforms or expansions of social safety nets.

In conclusion, the Cloward-Piven strategy is a provocative and contentious approach to political and social change that advocates overwhelming the welfare system to create a crisis and stimulate government responses. While it has generated significant debate and criticism, it has not led to the radical transformation of society as envisioned by its proponents. The legacy of the Cloward-Piven strategy lies in its impact on activism, ongoing discussions about welfare policy, and its role in shaping political discourse and polarization in the United States.